Sponsor for PC Pals Forum

Author Topic: GFX  (Read 1506 times)

Offline twiggy

  • Regular Member
  • **
  • Posts: 200
GFX
« on: May 29, 2004, 14:53 »
Hi all again. I have just been givin a GEFORCE 3 Ti200 64Mb gfx, now im not to fimlier with this rage of gfx. I have a gefore2 mx400 64mb. I was jsut wounderring which one is the better card (by experence or benchmark scores).

thanks mark

Offline Sandra

  • Ultimate Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12155
Re:GFX
« Reply #1 on: May 29, 2004, 15:11 »
I havent had any dealings with either of those cards Mark.
Have a look on here :

http://www.trustedreviews.com/index.aspx

They may have reviewed one or both of them, or check some other review sites out  :)

Offline Dack

  • Established Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 831
Re:GFX
« Reply #2 on: May 29, 2004, 18:21 »
Geforce 3 is quicker by about 50% to 100% on most benchmarks.

http://www20.tomshardware.com/graphic/20021218/index.html
hey promised the earth! Then delivered mud.
Technically it did meet the spec.

Offline ketamininja

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 270
Re:GFX
« Reply #3 on: June 01, 2004, 19:29 »
Always use Toms to check your specs  :)

Ti200 is better, mos def.

Offline twiggy

  • Regular Member
  • **
  • Posts: 200
Re:GFX
« Reply #4 on: June 10, 2004, 11:52 »
the card was actual a 128mb version. In answer to my own question i installed the card and ran my own benchmark using 3Dmark2001se here is the results.

(original) GeForce2 MX400 64MB Scored:2852
(new) GeForce3 Ti200 128MB Scored: 5693

 :o i was shocked what a huge difference considering on ebay the GeForce3 Ti200 128MB sells at only 10pound more than the GeForce2 MX400 64MB what a huge amount of improved performance for 10pound :o

thanks any way for all your help
mark


Show unread posts since last visit.
Sponsor for PC Pals Forum