I agree Sandra, but have you tried the 2006 version yet? Practically every review I have read has mentioned a significant system slowdown, even more so than with older versions. I am not against Norton, and yes, it probably is still one of the best systems around, but there's no harm in trying alternatives, and recommending them if found to be satisfactory. One BIG difference I have noticed is the amount of time Norton Firewall takes to flash up the permission box, if a new application tries to access the network. When I was using Norton Internet Security 2005, it could take up to 30 seconds to ask a permission, but with F-Secure, it's instantaneous. Also, doing a full system scan with Norton took around 3½ hours on my machine, but a full system scan with F-Secure, bearing in mind it's the same full system, takes around half the time Norton did, and on the first scan, found things Norton had missed, which had been in files on my system for years. Norton is also hell to install, particularly the Security Suite, and takes a good hour, with all the reboots between the numerous Live Updates initially required. It's also a bugger to uninstall. I switched from Bit Defender to F-Secure, and had everything updated and running in 30 minutes, and it didn't require more than one reboot during the process. As I said, I'm not against Norton, per se, but there are alternatives worth checking out.