I was referring to how little money went where people thought it was going when givin to charity Sam, not that it was going on arms although I did see a report from a woman in one of the african countries saying that a lot of the aid sent from oxfam was hijacked by rebels and terroroists so that most of it didnt get through to the people it was intended for.
Re the costs of the shops, they are usually free or low rent as normal shops cant afford the high rents in town and city centres so rather than let the shops stand empty they let charitiies use them and presumably claim a lot of money in tax relief. They are free of business taxes and most of their staff are volunteeres and the goods they sell are donated. It looks to me that such a low return on money donated indicates that someone higther up in the organisation is making quite a lot or the adminstration of the charity is very inefficient.