PC Pals Forum

General Discussion => Science & Nature => Topic started by: sam on July 12, 2010, 14:50

Title: Revised theory of gravity doesn't predict a Big Bang
Post by: sam on July 12, 2010, 14:50

Quote

The Big Bang theory has formed the basis of our understanding of the universe's origins since it was first proposed in 1927 by Georges Lemaitre. And for good reason: the theory is supported by scientists' latest observations and experiments, and is based on Einstein's widely accepted theory of general relativity. But scientists are always on the lookout for any evidence that might suggest an alternative to the Big Bang. The latest in this area of research comes from astrophysicists Maximo Banados and Pedro Ferreira, who have resurrected a theory of gravity from the early 20th century and discovered that a modified version of the theory may hold some surprises.

http://www.physorg.com/news198135631.html

Title: Re: Revised theory of gravity doesn't predict a Big Bang
Post by: Clive on July 12, 2010, 15:40

They are not the first and they won't be the last to dispute the Big Bang.  Hoyle was an undisputed genius yet he failed to disprove it.  It's simple and elegant and I think it's here to stay.  My money stays with Lemaitre.   ;D