PC Pals Forum

Technical Help & Discussion => General Tech Discussion, News & Q&A => Topic started by: sam on January 12, 2011, 23:57

Title: Why GIMP is Inadequate
Post by: sam on January 12, 2011, 23:57

Quote

GIMP is perhaps one of the most well known imaging apps available in Libre software. Its virtues are endorsed by many in the Libre software community. In a practical sense however, within North American art and design circles, its uptake is effectively zero.

http://troy-sobotka.blogspot.com/2011/01/why-gimp-is-inadequate.html

Title: Re: Why GIMP is Inadequate
Post by: Rik on January 13, 2011, 10:46

I have to agree with the arguments, Sam. I always post-process in 16 bits until print time.

Title: Re: Why GIMP is Inadequate
Post by: sam on January 13, 2011, 20:37

still its not bad for properly free software.

Title: Re: Why GIMP is Inadequate
Post by: D-Dan on January 13, 2011, 22:26

I posted this link over at Netters, though I think many of the same points apply to the whole "Gimp v Photoshop" debate. Rather than go in to the argument with all guns blazing, I recommend people read this first and take away the philosophy, if not the letter.

Steve

http://linux.oneandoneis2.org/LNW.htm

PS: I generally love FOSS, but I personally don't get on with Gimp and prefer PS myself.

Title: Re: Why GIMP is Inadequate
Post by: sam on January 13, 2011, 22:51

interest, will take a read.

For what I do GIMP is fine. Actually for most of what I do, I wouldn't want todo it any way except with the comandline tools of image magick. Why fire up a GUI when I can just do:

Code: [Select]

mogrify -resize 1024 *JPG