Sponsor for PC Pals Forum

Author Topic: Cricket.  (Read 5461 times)

Offline sam

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 19977
Re: Cricket.
« Reply #15 on: December 28, 2006, 11:40 »
the one dayers? we havent a chance in hell with those, we are useless at that!! maybe we should play 20-20, we might have a chance!
- sam | @starrydude --

Offline chorleydave

  • Forum Fanatic
  • ******
  • Posts: 5035
Re: Cricket.
« Reply #16 on: December 28, 2006, 11:54 »
Only because it also involves drinking huge quantities of beer!  ;D

:pmsl:

Offline mistybear

  • Forum Fanatic
  • ******
  • Posts: 7656
Re: Cricket.
« Reply #17 on: January 04, 2007, 13:21 »
. What is the English version of a hat-trick?
       A. Three runs in three balls.
Those who can make you believe absurdities,
can make you commit atrocities.

Offline Clive

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 75152
  • Won Quiz of the Year 2015,2016,2017, 2020, 2021
Re: Cricket.
« Reply #18 on: January 04, 2007, 13:39 »
 :hee-hee:

Offline sam

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 19977
Re: Cricket.
« Reply #19 on: January 04, 2007, 13:44 »
. What is the English version of a hat-trick?
       A. Three runs in three balls.

id have just been happy for not getting out after 3 balls, but hey maybe I am being too harsh.
- sam | @starrydude --

Offline mistybear

  • Forum Fanatic
  • ******
  • Posts: 7656
Re: Cricket.
« Reply #20 on: January 04, 2007, 13:50 »
 :lol: no not really.
Those who can make you believe absurdities,
can make you commit atrocities.

Offline sam

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 19977
Re: Cricket.
« Reply #21 on: January 04, 2007, 17:29 »
 :bawl:
- sam | @starrydude --

Offline gmax

  • Established Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 712
Re: Cricket.
« Reply #22 on: January 11, 2007, 06:12 »
you need  :more players that can hit the ball hard, maybe lure "Ian Botham" out of retirement!, its your only hope!  :D

Offline sam

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 19977
Re: Cricket.
« Reply #23 on: January 11, 2007, 08:45 »
lol
- sam | @starrydude --

Offline gmax

  • Established Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 712
Re: Cricket.
« Reply #24 on: January 15, 2007, 13:36 »
Federal Court Ruling from the Melbourne Age, Australia (AP) ? A seven year old Aboriginal boy was at the centre of a courtroom drama yesterday when he challenged a court ruling over who should have custody of him. The boy has a history of being beaten by his parents and the judge initially awarded custody to his aunt, in keeping with the child custody law and regulations requiring that family unity be maintained to the degree possible. The boy surprised the court when he proclaimed that his Aunt beat him more than his parents and he adamantly refused to live with her. When the judge suggested that he live with his grandparents, the boy cried out that they also beat him.

After considering the remainder of the immediate family and learning that domestic violence was apparently a way of life among them, the judge took the unprecedented step of allowing the boy to propose who should have custody of him.












After two recesses to check legal references and confer with child welfare officials, the judge granted temporary custody to the English Cricket Team, whom the boy firmly believes are "not capable of beating
_________________

Offline Rodders

  • Forum Fanatic
  • ******
  • Posts: 6495
  • Bournemouth: Where even the water is 'ard!
Re: Cricket.
« Reply #25 on: January 15, 2007, 14:18 »
A cricketer was visiting his psychiatrist.

Cricketer:  "It's awful.  I can't score runs, I'm a terrible bowler and I can't hold a catch.  What can l do?"

Psychiatrist:  "Get another job."

Cricketer:  "I can't.  I'm playing for England tomorrow."



Offline mistybear

  • Forum Fanatic
  • ******
  • Posts: 7656
Re: Cricket.
« Reply #26 on: January 16, 2007, 09:17 »
Q. What do you call an Englishman with 100 runs against his name?

A. A bowler.
Those who can make you believe absurdities,
can make you commit atrocities.

Offline chorleydave

  • Forum Fanatic
  • ******
  • Posts: 5035
Re: Cricket.
« Reply #27 on: January 26, 2007, 20:54 »
Putting aside all the mirth for a moment, consider the poor souls such as a mate of mine who put a bet on at the bookies that England wouldn't win in single match down-under this winter.

England have managed just one solitary victory since stepping on Australian soil last November, a one day win against New Zealand.  As they are unlikely to win any more (as Bangladesh aren't in the itinerary) that solitary victory has lost my mate a small fortune while the bookies are laughing all the way to the bank.   >:(

Offline Clive

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 75152
  • Won Quiz of the Year 2015,2016,2017, 2020, 2021
Re: Cricket.
« Reply #28 on: January 26, 2007, 22:09 »
while the bookies are laughing all the way to the bank.   >:(

Nothing new there then Dave! 

Offline mistybear

  • Forum Fanatic
  • ******
  • Posts: 7656
Re: Cricket.
« Reply #29 on: January 27, 2007, 08:35 »
It was unfortunate for your mate with the kiwi's not having a full strength team for that game, I was actually surprised that you guys won. But with Oram back and with Styris and Mills yet to return things won't get any easier for you.
I was very disappointed with freddy winning the toss, I really want to see what sort of score we can get batting first. I was looking forward to an evening of cricket as there was bugger all else on, and when our internet connection when belly up, that was the final straw. 
Those who can make you believe absurdities,
can make you commit atrocities.


Show unread posts since last visit.
Sponsor for PC Pals Forum