Sponsor for PC Pals Forum

Author Topic: Wikipedia 'loses' 49,000 editors  (Read 1011 times)

Offline Simon

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 77923
  • First to score 7/7 in Quiz of The Week's News 2017
Wikipedia 'loses' 49,000 editors
« on: November 25, 2009, 22:06 »
Online encyclopaedia Wikipedia "lost" 49,000 of its volunteer editors in the first three months of 2009, University research suggests.

The figure compares with a loss of 4,900 over the same period in 2008.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8379566.stm
Many thanks to all our members, who have made PC Pals such an outstanding success!   :thumb:

Offline sam

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 19977
Re: Wikipedia 'loses' 49,000 editors
« Reply #1 on: November 25, 2009, 22:09 »
it'll turn out to be one guy in the end, called Geoff.
- sam | @starrydude --

Offline Simon

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 77923
  • First to score 7/7 in Quiz of The Week's News 2017
Re: Wikipedia 'loses' 49,000 editors
« Reply #2 on: November 25, 2009, 22:21 »
 ;D
Many thanks to all our members, who have made PC Pals such an outstanding success!   :thumb:

Offline Clive

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 75153
  • Won Quiz of the Year 2015,2016,2017, 2020, 2021
Re: Wikipedia 'loses' 49,000 editors
« Reply #3 on: November 25, 2009, 22:52 »
it'll turn out to be one guy in the end, called Geoff.

Is that your pseudonym Sam?  ;D

Offline sam

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 19977
Re: Wikipedia 'loses' 49,000 editors
« Reply #4 on: November 25, 2009, 23:44 »
not that I know of..
- sam | @starrydude --

Offline Simon

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 77923
  • First to score 7/7 in Quiz of The Week's News 2017
Re: Wikipedia 'loses' 49,000 editors
« Reply #5 on: November 26, 2009, 00:17 »
It's probably because there's not so much to edit, now it's established.
Many thanks to all our members, who have made PC Pals such an outstanding success!   :thumb:

Offline sam

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 19977
Re: Wikipedia 'loses' 49,000 editors
« Reply #6 on: November 26, 2009, 00:38 »
It's probably because there's not so much to edit, now it's established.

and its fully of picky, pretentious arses. I put an article together once and got told it was copyrighted text and I could use it - stupid thing is I wrote the text that they were moaning about and it was on a website I maintain, argh!
- sam | @starrydude --

Offline Simon

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 77923
  • First to score 7/7 in Quiz of The Week's News 2017
Re: Wikipedia 'loses' 49,000 editors
« Reply #7 on: November 26, 2009, 10:01 »
 ::)
Many thanks to all our members, who have made PC Pals such an outstanding success!   :thumb:


Show unread posts since last visit.
Sponsor for PC Pals Forum